April 25, 2018 | Working Paper
  • Headline: The Fallacies of Negative Interest Rate Policy
  • Intro Text: Negative interest rate policy has become a consensus position within the economics establishment. But Thomas Palley argues that this consensus is dangerously wrong. The approach draws on the fallacious theoretical position that there is a natural rate of interest which can ensure full employment, and further, that the natural rate may be negative in times of severe demand shortage. Policy interventions must then deliver negative rates since the market cannot. Palley explains how this approach ignores the possibility that negative interest rates may reduce aggregate demand and contribute to financial fragility.  
  • Type of publication: Working Paper
  • Research or In The Media: Research
  • Research Area: Finance, Jobs & Macroeconomics
  • Publication Date: 2018-04-25
  • View pdf
  • Authors:
    • Add Authors: Thomas I. Palley
  • Show in Front Page Modules: Yes
  • JEL Codes: E12
Negative Interest Rate Policy (NIRP) and the Fallacy of the Natural Rate of Interest: Why NIRP May Worsen Keynesian Unemployment

Abstract

NIRP has quickly become a consensus policy within the economics establishment. This paper argues that consensus is dangerously wrong, resting on flawed theory and flawed policy assessment. Regarding theory, NIRP draws on fallacious pre-Keynesian classical economic logic that asserts there is a natural rate of interest which can ensure full employment. That pre-Keynesian logic has been augmented by ZLB economics which claims the natural rate may be negative in times of severe demand shortage, so that policy must deliver it since the market cannot. In contrast, Keynes argued investment could become saturated so lower interest rates cannot increase aggregate demand (AD) and no natural interest rate exists. Regarding policy assessment, NIRP turns a blind eye to the possibility that negative interest rates may reduce AD, cause financial fragility, create a macroeconomics of whiplash owing to contradictions between policy today and tomorrow, promote currency wars that undermine the international economy, and foster a political economy that spawns toxic politics. Worst of all, NIRP maintains and encourages the flawed model of growth, based on debt and asset price inflation, which has already done such harm.

umass logo

This is an official web page
of the University of Massachusetts.

Political Economy Research Institute

Gordon Hall, 418 N. Pleasant St., Suite A

Amherst, MA 01002
Tel: 413-545-6355 Fax: 413-577-0261
Contact: